Pinards PDF

On Josephus in the Biblical Errancy newsletter: McKinsey: “This passage is so obviously spurious that it is astonishing to find a single theologian left in our time . The Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy has 34 ratings and 4 reviews. Josh said: Anyone who claims themselves to be Christian needs to read this book, and b. This important new volume is the most comprehensive critique of the Bible ever written. Author C. Dennis McKinsey believes that Americans.

Author: Kagalmaran Mecage
Country: Montenegro
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 15 June 2016
Pages: 453
PDF File Size: 16.86 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.20 Mb
ISBN: 526-7-58539-986-8
Downloads: 68467
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudobei

C. Dennis McKinsey’s Biblical Errancy Website

If McKinsey is able to address and refute the arguments herethen we will take the matter further. No Jew would have interpreted this to mean that he would one day look out the window and see Jesus riding by on a cloud.

McKinsey responded by objecting that there was no “official ordinance” on the subject — just oral law and the Mishnah. Indeed, McKinsey’s disdain for scholarship is poignantly exemplified in the following exchange from the nd BE newsletter, beginning with this note from that same CRI rep referred to earlier:.

Item 8 simply quotes Joseph McCabe’s opinion that “it is astonishing to find a single theologian left in our time who accepts the passage as genuine.

He Can’t Be Both! Errwncy are incorrect in stating he “single-handedly disproves Biblical inerrancy. Does Jesus Judge or Not? I would be interested to hear from any skeptics or serious students of the Bible who could make the case that the hypothesized solutions of either Hendriksen or Geldenhuys are not feasible. All both sides can do is study the issue and remain humble in light of the dearth of facts.

Speaking in the strictest and most formal logical sense, the syllogism may still be true, but in that case it will not be because of the logical structure of the syllogism.

  AKG D310 PDF

Who Bought the Field: If extra information presents a reasonable and possible solution to the discrepancy, then we can perhaps still agree with the skeptic that the reasonable and possible solution is after all just only possible and not necessarily the solution, but we cannot agree with those who refuse to consider evidence against their case and maintain that there is a necessary contradiction bibkical.

Merely knowing mckinseu the Bible contains wrrancy fallacies and contradictions is The majority of the objections here are “harmonization” issues. Hardian’s objection is about a syncretistic, huckster environment and offers no evidence of a bona fide use of the term “Christian” by Serapis-worshippers. Michael von Sacher-Masoch rated errancu it was amazing May 01, Many people Christians deride this book without ever having read it.

C. Dennis McKinsey, Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy refuted

The reader must decide for himself or herself if my attempt is successful. Inspired by Your Browsing History. To bail myself of any vats of boiling oil that await me, let me add that the conclusion is NOT true.

If the Bible is as McKinsey claims, then our faith is reduced to a fideistic position or an existential one. We Christian students should never be afraid of acknowledging that there are places in Scripture where the ultimate solution ddennis us. In the discussion of blasphemy, McKinsey later makes the rhetorical question “Does that make sense considering the fact that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are equal?

Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids mckinseg the go.

A criticism of the supposed conflict between Jesus and Paul regarding the criteria for salvation, with Matt. I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. Not the Taciteans, who have said no such thing.

If this is an argument, we could name 20 times as many who are of the opposite mind. Return to Book Page. In two minutes, I could ask more questions that are philosophically challenging to classical theism than Erranfy could probably answer in a millennium of research. If we were there and knew all of the facts, we would be in a position to more authoritatively evaluate matters. The debate continued in issue 40 of the EBE newsletter when a letter-writer provided Jewish literary citations indicating what a Sabbath’s day journey was.


Who was Joseph’s Father?

And I say further: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Dennis McKinsey clearly shows that the Bible is not the inerrant word of God that Christians believe it to be. And let us not be deluded as to the importance of the trustworthiness of the gospels. Certainly both statements could be false, or one could be true while the other is false, or both could be true, but it is not valid to state that it is necessarily the case that the truth of one excludes the truth of the other.

The Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy

Mckinsey devotes less than five pages to the canon and its development. McKinsey typically begins larger his responses this way — with a short, descriptive comment denigrating the quality of his opponent’s argument. If I go up to the heavens, you are there; bilical I make my bed in the depths, you are there.

McKinsey offers with this cite — mciinsey involves a copyist error — a story of how he confounded a Church of Christ minister on a radio show with this question.

He taught social studies full-time at the secondary level for ten years. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.