Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Barbara W. Tuchman, author of the World War I masterpiece The Guns of August, grapples with her boldest subject. Current U.S. politics can be defined by what the historian referred to in her book “The March of Folly” as a “wooden-headedness” in. IN her latest book, Barbara W. Tuchman – the author of such . But any way one approaches ”The March of Folly,” it is unsatisfying, to say the.
|Published (Last):||12 December 2008|
|PDF File Size:||17.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If only the American presidents and their staff had listened to advisors who from the tuchkan questioned the importance of Vietnam and our ability to win there. The British arrogantly ignored the reality of the American colonist’s unwillingness to be treated as second class citizens and continued to pursue a series of policies that led to a 6 year war, a war they knew they could neither win nor afford after the Battle of Saratoga in To look at the history of modern man since about 1, BC and take examples of real foolishness on the part of a number of key governments, and try to see why they so acted, strikes me as a wonderful idea for a book.
As such, it is more of a screed against certain practices, rather than a real attempt at balanced or impartial history. Her clear, dramatic storytelling covered topics as diverse as mzrch 14th century and World War I, and sold millions of copie Barbara Wertheim Tuchman was an American self-trained historian and author and double Pulitzer Prize winner. Kings, Po The March of Folly is an unfortunate title. In talking to a couple from his constituency who had lost a marvh in Vietnam, he faced the stark recognition that he could find no words to justify the boy’s death.
It’s just amazing, the utter blindness and stupidity of some of the people in high places, from way, way back, up to baarbara present time. All major foply advisors argued against this action, and public notice began to grow.
Tuchman takes up a panoramic view follt human history and exposes these decisions, and wonders with us how much Folly it took to make these disastrous calls. Barbara Tuchman was a journalist before becoming a history author, and despite The March of Folly being a book about certain historical incidents, it is more a work of journalism than history.
Tuchman considers the end result of the conflict to be fairly inevitable and right or wrong, this assumption helps keep her on-topicand concentrates on how British policy ended up alienating people who wanted to be part of the empire into rebelling. As such, it paints a picture of the excesses and temporal politics of the office while calls for ecclesiastical reform go unheeded. Or maybe not so unfortunate. Darius tichman that they should keep to the rule of one and obtain the best government by choosing “the very best man in the whole state.
So I’d give this one a shot. Her writing and exhaustive research does plenty to convince the reader of her perspective.
These follies are chosen because viable alternatives were available and popularly supported, and the decisions wer Good topic, but a little dry, fairly dense, and not as good as The Guns of August. The author looks at the causes of four historical “folly” events – the Trojan Horse, 6 corrupt Renaissance Popes tuch,an to the Reformation and a sack of Romethe lead-up to the American revolution primarily from the British sideand finally French and American involvement in Vietnam and SE Asia.
This was a defeat for the Barara. There seemed to tuchnan an awful lot of ‘facts’ in each chapter. This page was last edited on 8 Decemberat Also by Barbara W. Man, talk about phoning it in Good topic, but a little dry, fairly dense, and not as good as The Guns of August. Download our Spring Fiction Sampler Now. Living in America we obviously and rightfully approach the American Revolution from an American-centric perspective.
Kind of like the “color-man” while listening to a sporting event, Tuchman examines the idea of “folly,” or the persistent pursuit of a policy by government or those in power that is “contradictory to their own interests.
What I found most interesting about this discussion of the major events that led tuuchman the American Revolution is that Tuchman spent most of her time looking through the eyes of the British, in contrast to peering through the marchh of the American colonist, which is the more common perspective used in studies of this period.
The French had held Vietnam before WWII and wanted to reestablish its control after the war, but the Vietnamese were rebelling against this colonial rule. Stay in Touch Sign up. To remove the problem from personality, a third criterion must be that the policy in question should be that of a group, not an individual ruler, and should persist beyond any one political lifetime.
The examples used are valid and make sense. Tuchman’s thesis re ‘folly’ was a new viewpoint for me, so I’m pleased that I read as much as I did.
The March of Folly
This should make us conclude that the main message of the book, and of history, is one of Tolstoy-ian embrace of tuchhman ‘Wisdom of the Masses’? Ignore my suggestions at your own risk. He too continued the unquestioned view of tuchjan to stop Communist ideology. Jan 10, James rated it liked it Shelves: Pulitzer Prize—winning historian Barbara W.
One can only imagine the new bodily orifice Tuchman would have ripped over Iraq and Afghanistan. In this one she tells several and keeps your attention better.
Book review — THE MARCH OF FOLLY By Barbara W. Tuchman
In any event the book is an excellent supplement to studying Machiavellian politics. As an author, Tuchman focused on producing popular history. This is usually done because those in power are so consumed by power and what it brings, that their arrogance and ignorance blinds them. She’s just slumming it here; not trying very hard. The author finds something different within each one that allows us to see the many levels of government folly.
So it appears to me, especially with reference to the beginning of the book, where she discusses both the siege of Troy and then the Papacy during the Renaissance, when she seems very shaky indeed.