Pinards PDF

16 set. Com base nas obras A teoria da democracia revisitada – o debate contemporâneo (Giovanni Sartori), Poliarquia: Participação e Oposição. A Teoria da Democracia Revisitada – Giovani Sartori. 5 likes. Book. From a contemporary point of view, within political science, reference may be made to the work of Giovanni Sartori, A Teoria da Democracia Revisitada, trans.

Author: Duhn Arashilabar
Country: Barbados
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 13 November 2006
Pages: 223
PDF File Size: 8.63 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.76 Mb
ISBN: 593-3-62123-865-5
Downloads: 17278
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Sashura

As is generally known, the seminal work of Figueiredo and Limongi triggered a fruitful controversy: However strong presidential efforts and resources were, a saartori electoral logic prevailed for many deputies, bringing about a split in the governing coalition and scant results as to the issue in Congress.

It proposes, among other points, the alteration of criteria for full pensions in the case of current servants, the possibility that each additional year of contribution could reduce the equivalent in the minimum age and the continuance of full parity for future pensioners who fulfill the requisites for full pensions.

According to him, cohesion “refers to the differentiation of political stances within a party before any discussion or voting on a given issue within the party itself”, while discipline regards “the party’s ability to control their members’ votes in parliament”.

One of them was passed by votes against 3, with 19 abstentions.

According to Nicolau In our view, a sound explanation would have to take into account the following factors. This article ra Brazilian social security reform during the Fernando Henrique and Lula Administrations. Even though a broad consensus had been built in Brazilian society concerning the inevitability of a reform, there were bitter controversies as to its extent, timing and on whom most costs should fall on.

The executive’s measure, soon dismembered by the rapporteur of the Committee on Constitution and Justice CCJ into four different constitutional amendments Figueiredo and Limongi, ; Melo, tekria, contributed for the union of giovanhi several coalition leaders in a large group against the reform and hampered administration’s attempts to exploit differences between national union confederations and the public servants.


By the beginning of the votes on PEC 40, the governing coalition possessed members, having reached teoroa the second round. Contrary to what many people state, the path followed by the current administration is not a “policy switch”, but rather, to the displeasure of the most orthodox PT members, a faithful accomplishment of campaign commitments, without which Lula would not have mustered sufficient support to end up victorious in the second round.

O que foi escrito sobre democracia

Such a strategy was not available for the administration in the first stage of the reform, once the tax reform had been taken out of the legislative agenda by the then president. Perhaps more importantly, the social security reform was “nested” with its tax counterpart. O Estado numa Era de Reformas: At the end of the process, in the second round, the division of PDT members was evident: The Journal of Legislative Studies9 3: America Latina Hoy Such factors, as the above-mentioned authors emphasize, allow the Brazilian institutional arrangement to become consistent with the stability of democratic order: As they act in a continuous decision-making setting, legislators tend to show a disciplined behavior because it seems to them that vote with their leader is the less costly choice.

Agora8, Buenos Aires.

O que foi escrito sobre democracia – DAGOBAH

It is all at once a multiple-arena bargain and an interaction involving institutional innovation, whose consequences imply a “deconstitutionalization” of rules and retirement rights Melo, The former petition aimed at the suppression of the retiree’s contribution, while the latter targeted the reform’s cut in the pensions left by deceased public servants.

His report has not been voted yet. How explain to militants and consistent supporters that in opposition the party should oppose to what it had always backed? As one can gather from these data, the impact of governors on the party caucus in the Chamber was considerably smaller than in the case of PFL.

Dados44 4: In the second part, we turn our attention specifically to a comparison of patterns of behavior on the floor. What about the opposition parties?


These changes led to the concentration of agenda powers givanni the hands of party leaders and the president, restricting significantly the discretion of other actors. As to the DVS 3, which aimed at the exclusion of revisitsda so-called sartpri funds” from the calculation of the public service’s wage ceiling, it was defeated by 27 votes towith PFL and PSDB siding with the administration.

Such situations are liable to generate a high degree of uncertainty among actors, either because people do not trust promises from the executive or due to a belief that the administration itself does not control several factors that, once at play, may eliminate the promised benefits. Lula, on the contrary, suffered no defeat in important votes and his proposal, after going rather rapidly through the Congress’ channels, was passed without major changes.

A Teoria Da Democracia Revisitada – Giovanni Sartori – Google Books

Studies in American Political Development2: The reform game begun in Brazil with a proposal of constitutional amendment PEC 33 sent by president Cardoso to Congress in April A proposal presented by either the Chamber of Deputies or the Federal Senate has to be signed by at least one third of its members; the other alternative is a joint presentation by a majority of the state assemblies, backed by a plurality of the votes cast in each of them.

English pdf Article in xml format Article references How to cite this article Automatic translation Send this article by e-mail. The party does not have to bargain, yield, being flexible, or negotiate in the name of governability and other desiderata that haunt democratic rulers everywhere. From the comparison between the two reformist processes it is evident that: